Technical Data Sheet
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| melt mass-flow rate | | ASTMD1238 | 2.5 g/10min |
| Shrinkage rate | | ASTMD955 | 0.10到0.30 % |
| Shrinkage rate | | ASTMD955 | 1.6到1.8 % |
| Water absorption rate | | ASTMD570 | 0.030 % |
| density | | ASTMD792 | 1.47 g/cm³ |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Rockwell hardness | M-Scale | ASTMD785 | 87 |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| elongation | | ASTMD638 | 1.8 % |
| elongation | Break | ISO527-2/1A/5 | 1.8 % |
| Flexural modulus | | ASTMD790 | 10400 MPa |
| Flexural modulus | | ISO178 | 13200 MPa |
| bending strength | | ASTMD790 | 211 MPa |
| bending strength | | ISO178 | 203 MPa |
| compressive strength | | ASTMD695 | 121 MPa |
| shear strength | | ASTMD732 | 70.0 MPa |
| Tensile modulus | | ASTMD638 | 13000 MPa |
| Tensile modulus | | ISO527-2/1A/1 | 15500 MPa |
| Tensile stress | Yield | ISO527-2/1A/5 | 156 MPa |
| Tensile stress | | ASTMD638 | 143 MPa |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTMD256 | 53 J/m |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO180 | 5.8 kJ/m² |
| Suspended wall beam without notch impact strength | | ASTMD4812 | 410 J/m |
| Suspended wall beam without notch impact strength | | ISO180 | 28 kJ/m² |
| Filling analysis | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| melt viscosity | | | 270 Pa·s |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| | ASTMD648 | 276 °C |
| Glass Transition Temperature | | ASTMD3418 | 152 °C |
| | ASTMD3418 | 343 °C |
| | ASTME831 | 1E-05 cm/cm/°C |
| specific heat | | DSC | 1250 J/kg/°C |
| specific heat | | DSC | 1710 J/kg/°C |
| thermal conductivity | | ASTME1530 | 0.34 W/m/K |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Compare