Technical Data Sheet
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| density | | ISO 1183 | 1.24 g/cm³ |
| Melt volume flow rate | | ISO 1133 | 8.00 cm³/10min |
| Water absorption rate | | ISO 62 | 0.11 % |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Shore hardness | | ISO 868 | 98 |
| Shore hardness | | ISO 868 | 51 |
| Shore hardness | | ISO 868 | 51 |
| Shore hardness | | ISO 868 | 98 |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| tensile strength | | ISO 527-2 | 12.0 MPa |
| tensile strength | | ISO 527-2 | 17.0 MPa |
| tensile strength | | ISO 527-2 | 16.0 MPa |
| Nominal tensile fracture strain | | ISO 527-2 | 450 % |
| tensile strength | Break | ISO 527-2 | 32.0 MPa |
| tensile strength | | ISO 527-2 | 8.40 MPa |
| Tensile modulus | | ISO 527-2 | 160 MPa |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179/1eA | 5.6 kJ/m² |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179/1eA | NoBreak |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | 6.4 kJ/m² |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | 9.0 kJ/m² |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | NoBreak |
| Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Volume resistivity | | IEC 60093 | >1.0E+15 ohms·cm |
| dielectric strength | | IEC 60243-1 | 15 kV/mm |
| relative permittivity | | IEC 60250 | 4.34 |
| relative permittivity | | IEC 60250 | 3.58 |
| Dissipation Factor | | IEC 60250 | 0.021 |
| Dissipation Factor | | IEC 60250 | 0.046 |
| Compared to the Leakage Tracking Index (CTI) | | IEC 60112 | PLC 0 |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| melting temperature | | ISO 11357-3 | 205 °C |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ISO 11359-2 | 1.9E-04 cm/cm/°C |
| vicat | | ISO 306/B50 | 61.0 °C |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Compare