Technical Data Sheet
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| density | | ASTM D792 | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Melt volume flow rate | | ISO 1133 | 40.0 cm³/10min |
| Shrinkage rate | | ISO 294-4 | 0.40to0.70 % |
| density | | ISO 1183 | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| melt mass-flow rate | | ASTM D1238 | 4.4 g/10min |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Rockwell hardness | R-Scale | ASTM D785 | 115 |
| flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| UL flame retardant rating | | UL 94 | HB |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Flexural modulus | | ASTM D790 | 2550 MPa |
| Flexural modulus | | ISO 178 | 2100 MPa |
| bending strength | | ASTM D790 | 74.3 MPa |
| bending strength | | ISO 178 | 72.0 MPa |
| tensile strength | | ASTM D638 | 46.9 MPa |
| tensile strength | Yield | ISO 527-2/50 | 45.0 MPa |
| tensile strength | Break | ISO 527-2/50 | 32.0 MPa |
| elongation | | ASTM D638 | 20 % |
| elongation | Break | ISO 527-2/50 | 30 % |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179 | 9.0 kJ/m² |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179 | 17 kJ/m² |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTM D256 | 170 J/m |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTM D256 | 160 J/m |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | 8.0 kJ/m² |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | 16 kJ/m² |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| vicat | | ASTM D15257 | 105 °C |
| vicat | | ISO 306/B50 | 96.0 °C |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ISO 11359-2 | 8.9E-05 cm/cm/°C |
| vicat | | ISO 306/A50 | 104 °C |
| Heat distortion temperature | | ASTMD648 | 83.0 °C |
| Heat distortion temperature | | ASTM D648 | 95.0 °C |
| Heat distortion temperature | | ISO 75-2/A | 98.0 °C |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Compare