
PPO GX1050 MITSUBISHI ENGINEERING JAPAN
91
Form:Granules | Grade:Enhanced level
Properties:
Flame retardant gradeGlass fiber reinforcedLow Specific GravityStable forming sizeFiller: Glass fiber reinf20%Filler by weight
Typical Applications:
Electronic and electrical componentslighting
Product Description
Certificates(0)
Datasheet
Product Description
| Typical Applications: | Electronic and electrical components | lighting |
| Properties: | Flame retardant grade | Glass fiber reinforced | Low Specific Gravity | Stable forming size | Filler: Glass fiber reinf | 20% | Filler by weight |
Certificates
No Data...
Technical Data Sheet
| flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Test Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL flame retardant rating | 3.0mm | UL 94 | 5VB | |
| 1.5mm | UL 94 | V-1 | ||
| mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Test Unit |
| bending strength | 23°C | ISO 178 | 122 | Mpa |
| Bending modulus | 23°C | ISO 178 | 6000 | Mpa |
| Tensile strain | Break,23°C | ISO 527-2 | 2.7 | % |
| tensile strength | Break,23°C | ISO 527-2 | 75.0 | Mpa |
| Tensile modulus | 23°C | ISO 527-2 | 6100 | Mpa |
| thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Test Unit |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | TD | ISO 11359-2 | 6.8E-05 | cm/cm/°C |
| MD | ISO 11359-2 | 3.7E-05 | cm/cm/°C | |
| Hot deformation temperature | 1.8MPa,Unannealed | ISO 75-2/A | 105 | °C |
| Physical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Test Unit |
| Water absorption rate | Saturation,23°C | ISO 62 | 0.060 | % |
| Shrinkage rate | MD:3.20mm | 0.20-0.40 | % | |
| TD:3.20mm | 0.30-0.50 | % | ||
| Melt Volume Flow Rate (MVR) | 300°C/2.16kg | ISO 1133 | 24.0 | cm3/10min |
| Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result | Test Unit |
| Volume resistivity | IEC 60093 | 5E+15 | ohms·cm | |
| Surface resistivity | IEC 60093 | 1E+15 | ohms |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.