Technical Data Sheet
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| melt mass-flow rate | | ASTM D1238 | 1.5to2.0 g/10min |
| ash content | | | 0.025to0.050 % |
| gel content | | | 300 pcs/m² |
| gel content | | | 3.00 pcs/m² |
| gel content | | | 0.00 pcs/m² |
| gel content | | | 0.00 pcs/m² |
| density | | | 0.900 g/cm³ |
| Apparent density | | | 0.48to0.60 g/cm³ |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Rockwell hardness | R-Scale | | 75to82 |
| Supplementary Information | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| ThermalCreepTemperature | | | 70to80 °C |
| Thermal-oxidativeDeterioration | | | 20.8 day |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| tensile strength | Yield | ASTM D638 | 26.0 MPa |
| elongation | Yield | ASTM D638 | 11 % |
| Flexural modulus | | ASTM D790 | 900 MPa |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTM D256 | 90 J/m |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| vicat | | | 130to138 °C |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Compare