Technical Data Sheet
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| density | | g/cm³ | 1.35 -- |
| density | | ISO 1183/A | 1.35 g/cm3 |
| Shore hardness | | ISO 868 | 85 |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Shore hardness | | | 85 80 |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179/1eA | 3.0 KJ/m2 |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ISO 179/1eU | 45 KJ/m2 |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ISO 180/1A | 3.50 KJ/m2 |
| tensile strength | Break | MPa | 70.0 40.0 |
| Tensile strain | Break | % | 6.0 11 |
| Flexural modulus | | MPa | 3800 1500 |
| Tensile stress (fracture) | | ISO 527-2 | 70.0 MPa |
| Tensile strain (fracture) | | ISO 527-2 | 6.0 % |
| Flexural modulus | | ISO 178 | 3800 MPa |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | kJ/m² | 3.0 5.0 |
| Impact strength of simply supported beam without notch | | kJ/m² | 45 |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | kJ/m² | 3.5 6.0 |
| Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Volume resistivity | | IEC 60093 | 1E+15 ohm-cm |
| Leakage Traceability Index (Solution A) | | IEC 60112 | 450 V |
| dielectric strength | | IEC 60243-1 | 28 kv/mm |
| Volume resistivity | | ohms·cm | 1E+15 1E+12 |
| dielectric strength | | kV/mm | 28 24 |
| Compared to the Leakage Tracking Index (CTI) | | V | PLC 1 |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Heat distortion temperature | | ISO 75-2/Af | 75.0 ℃ |
| melting temperature | | ISO 3416 | 220 ℃ |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ASTM E831 | 0.000050 cm/cm/℃ |
| Heat distortion temperature | | °C | 75.0 -- |
| melting temperature | | °C | 220 -- |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | cm/cm/°C | 5E-05 -- |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Compare