Technical Data Sheet
Compare
| physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Shrinkage rate | | 东丽法 | 0.15 % |
| Shrinkage rate | | 东丽法 | 0.55 % |
| | 东丽法 | 90 |
| Shrinkage rate | | 内部方法 | 0.50 % |
| Shrinkage rate | | 内部方法 | 0.20 % |
| Water absorption rate | | ISO 62 | 0.020 % |
| hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Rockwell hardness | | ISO 2039-2 | 123 |
| other | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| characteristic | | | 高硬度 |
| Color | | | 本色.黑 |
| flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| UL flame retardant rating | | UL 94 | V-0 |
| Basic performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Water absorption rate | | ASTM D-570 | 0.02 % |
| Supplementary Information | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| BarFlowLength | | 内部方法 | 9.00 CM |
| Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| bending strength | | ASTM D-790 | 200 Mpa |
| elongation at break | | ASTM D-732 | 60 |
| limiting pv value | | 东丽法 | 815 KJ/m |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTM D-256 | 90 J/m |
| Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | | ASTM D-256 | 20 KJ/m |
| abrasion | | ASTM D-1044 | 70 mg/1000回 |
| tensile strength | | ASTM D-638 | 140 Mpa |
| coefficient of friction | | ASTM D-1894 | 0.30 |
| tensile strength | | ASTM D-638 | 1.2 % |
| Shore hardness | | ASTM D-785 | 123 洛氏 |
| bending strength | | ASTM D-790 | 17.6 GPa |
| tensile strength | | ISO 527-2 | 115 Mpa |
| Tensile strain | | ISO 527-2 | 0.80 % |
| Flexural modulus | | ISO 178 | 22000 Mpa |
| bending strength | | ISO 178 | 200 Mpa |
| shear strength | | JISK7214 | 60.0 Mpa |
| coefficient of friction | | | 0.30 |
| Taber abraser | | ISO 9352 | 70.0 mg |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ASTM D256/ISO 179 | 7 kg·cm/cm(J/M)ft·lb/in |
| Charpy Notched Impact Strength | | ASTM D256/ISO 179 | 16 kg·cm/cm(J/M)ft·lb/in |
| elongation at break | | ASTM D638/ISO 527 | 0.8 % |
| tensile strength | | ASTM D638/ISO 527 | 115 kg/cm²(MPa)[Lb/in²] |
| Rockwell hardness | | ASTM D785 | 123 |
| Flexural modulus | | ASTM D790/ISO 178 | 22 kg/cm²(MPa)[Lb/in²] |
| bending strength | | ASTM D790/ISO 178 | 200 kg/cm²(MPa)[Lb/in²] |
| Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Impact strength of simply supported beam without notch | | ISO 179 | 16 kJ/m² |
| Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| dielectric strength | | ASTM D-149 | 15 MV/m |
| Inherent resistance of volume | | ASTM D-257 | 10 Ω.m |
| arc resistance | | ASTM D-495 | 182 秒 |
| Induced positive connection | | ASTM D-150 | 0.002 |
| dielectric constant | | ASTM D-150 | 5.8 |
| Volume resistivity | | IEC 60093 | 1E+16 ohms·cm |
| dielectric strength | | IEC 60243-1 | 22 KV/mm |
| dielectric constant | | IEC 60250 | 5.00 |
| Dissipation Factor | | IEC 60250 | 2E-03 |
| dielectric constant | | ASTM D150/IEC 60250 | 5 |
| Volume resistivity | | ASTM D257/IEC 60093 | 1014 Ω.cm |
| Physical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| density | | ASTM D792/ISO 1183 | 2.06 |
| Shrinkage rate | | ASTM D955 | 0.5 % |
| Water absorption rate | | ASTM D570/ISO 62 | 0.02 % |
| Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
|---|
| Heat distortion temperature | | ASTM D-648 | >260 °C |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ASTM D-696 | 1.6 |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ASTM D-696 | 2.4 |
| melting temperature | | DSC | 278 °C |
| combustibility | | UL -94 | V-0 |
| Heat distortion temperature | | ISO 75-2/A | 260 °C |
| melting temperature | | ISO 11357-3 | 278 °C |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ISO 11359-2 | 1.9E-05 cm/cm/°C |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ISO 11359-2 | 2E-05 cm/cm/°C |
| Combustibility (rate) | | UL 94 | V-0 |
| melting temperature | | | 278 ℃（℉） |
| Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | | ASTM D696/ISO 11359 | 1.9 mm/mm.℃ |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
