
PP LUPOL® GP2100-NP LG GUANGZHOU
278
- Unit Price:US$ 1,506 /MT
- Packaging Specification:25 KG/PKG
- Packaging Material:Paper bag
- Supply Quantity:80MT
- Delivery Terms:FOB
- Port of Loading :China Main Port
- Accepted Payment Methods:T/T
- Shipping:Negotiate supplier for shipping details
Supplier Information
ASIA PLASTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED
+86 755 ********View
serv********View
For more details, please contact the supplier!
Material Description
- Material Properties:Glass fiber reinforced|heat-resisting|currency
- Application Areas:Home appliance components|Electronic field|Electrical field|Electrical and Electronics
- Color:--
- Grade:Flame retardant grade
Technical Data Sheet
flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
UL flame retardant rating | 0.7 mm | UL 94 | - CLASS |
1.7 mm | UL 94 | - CLASS | |
1.5 mm | UL 94 | HB CLASS | |
3.0 mm | UL 94 | - CLASS |
mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Rockwell hardness | R-Scale | ASTM D-785 | - R-Scale |
Bending modulus | 3.20 mm@1.3 mm/min | ASTM D-790 | 38000 Mkg/cm2 |
bending strength | 3.20 mm@1.3 mm/min | ASTM D-790 | 1100 kg/cm2 |
Elongation at Break | Break,3.20 mm@50mm/min | 5.0 % | |
Yield,3.20 mm@5mm/min | ASTM D-638 | - % | |
tensile strength | Yield,3.20 mm@5mm/min | ASTM D-638 | 600 kg/cm2 |
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | 23°C | ASTM D256 | 9 kg·cm/cm |
thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
RTI | Electrical | UL 746B | 60 °C |
Vicat softening temperature | 5kg, 50℃/h | ASTM D1525 | - °C |
Hot deformation temperature | 4.6kg, Unannealed, 6.40 mm | ASTM D-648 | - °C |
18.6kg, Unannealed, 6.40 mm | ASTM D-648 | 97 °C |
Physical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Shrinkage rate | MD,3.20 mm | ASTM D-955 | 0.2-0.4 % |
melt mass-flow rate | 230℃/3.8kg | ASTM D-1238 | 2.5 g/10min |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.