
PPS DURAFIDE® 6165A6 HD9100 JAPAN POLYPLASTIC
324
- Unit Price:US$ 8,313 /MT
- Packaging Specification:25 KG/PKG
- Packaging Material:Paper bag
- Supply Quantity:15MT
- Delivery Terms:FOB
- Port of Loading :China Main Port
- Accepted Payment Methods:T/T
- Shipping:Negotiate supplier for shipping details
Supplier Information
ASIA PLASTIC EXCHANGE LIMITED
+86 755 ********View
serv********View
For more details, please contact the supplier!
Material Description
- Material Properties:Glass fiber reinforced|Flame retardant|standard|High temperature resistance|Filler: Glass mineral|65% filler by weight|65% filler by weight
- Application Areas:Fiber grade|Pump parts|Shell|Electrical/Electronic Applications
- Color:--
- Grade:Injection grade
Material Certification

Technical Data Sheet
physical property | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
density | ISO 1183 | 1.95 g/cm³ | |
Shrinkage rate | ISO 2577 | 0.2-0.6 % | |
density | ASTM D792 | 2.00 g/cm³ | |
Specific volume | ASTM D792 | 0.502 cm³/g | |
density | ISO 1183 | 1.95 g/cm³ | |
Shrinkage rate | ASTM D955 | 0.10-0.20 % | |
ASTM D955 | 0.30-0.50 % | ||
ISO 294-4 | 0.30-0.70 % | ||
ISO 294-4 | 0.20-0.60 % | ||
Water absorption rate | ISO 62 | 0.020 % | |
SpecificHeatCapacity of Melt | 内部方法 | 1600 J/kg/°C |
hardness | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Rockwell hardness | ASTM D785 | 100 | |
ISO 2039-2 | 100 |
flammability | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
UL flame retardant rating | UL 94 | V-0 | |
UL 94 | V-0 |
Basic performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Water absorption rate | ISO 62 | 0.02 % |
Mechanical properties | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Rockwell hardness | ISO 2039-2 | 100 M-scale | |
Tensile modulus | ISO 527-1 | 19000 Mpa | |
tensile strength | ISO 527-1 | 130 Mpa | |
elongation | ISO 527-1 | 1.2 % | |
Flexural modulus | ISO 178 | 18800 Mpa | |
bending strength | ISO 178 | 210 Mpa | |
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | ISO 180/1A | 6 kJ/m² | |
Tensile modulus | ISO 527-2/1A/1 | 19000 Mpa | |
tensile strength | ASTM D638 | 114 Mpa | |
ISO 527-2/1A/5 | 130 Mpa | ||
elongation | ASTM D638 | 1.3 % | |
Tensile strain | ISO 527-2/1A/5 | 1.2 % | |
Flexural modulus | ISO 178 | 18800 Mpa | |
bending strength | ISO 178 | 210 Mpa |
Impact resistance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | ISO 180/1A | 6.0 kJ/m² | |
Suspended wall beam without notch impact strength | ISO 180/1U | 20 kJ/m² | |
Charpy Notched Impact Strength | ISO 179/1eA | 7.0 kJ/m² | |
ISO 179/1eA | 7.0 kJ/m² | ||
Impact strength of simply supported beam without notch | ISO 179/1eU | 20 kJ/m² | |
ISO 179/1eU | 20 kJ/m² | ||
Impact strength of cantilever beam gap | ISO 180/1A | 6.0 kJ/m² |
Electrical performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Surface Resistivity | IEC 60093 | >1.0E+15 ohms | |
Volume resistivity | ASTM D257 | 1E+16 ohms·cm | |
IEC 60093 | >1.0E+15 ohms·cm | ||
dielectric strength | IEC 60243-1 | 25 KV/mm | |
dielectric constant | ASTM D150 | 4.50 | |
ASTM D150 | 4.50 | ||
relative permittivity | IEC 60250 | 5.60 | |
Dissipation Factor | ASTM D150 | 1E-03 | |
ASTM D150 | 9E-04 | ||
IEC 60250 | 2E-03 | ||
arc resistance | ASTM D495 | 182 sec | |
Compared to the Leakage Tracking Index (CTI) | IEC 60112 | PLC 3 |
Thermal performance | Test Condition | Test Method | Test Result |
---|---|---|---|
Heat distortion temperature | ISO 75-1 | 270 °C | |
UL flame retardant rating | UL 94 | V-0 | |
Heat distortion temperature | ASTM D648 | 280 °C | |
ASTM D648 | 266 °C | ||
ISO 75-2/A | 270 °C | ||
ISO 75-2/C | 215 °C | ||
Glass Transition Temperature | ISO 11357-2 | 90.0 °C | |
melting temperature | ISO 11357-3 | 280 °C | |
Linear coefficient of thermal expansion | ISO 11359-2 | 1.9E-05 cm/cm/°C | |
ISO 11359-2 | 2.4E-05 cm/cm/°C |
IMPORTANT NOTES: Plas.com collected the data in the data sheet from the material manufacturers. Plas.com makes the best effort to improve the accuracy of the data, but has no responsibility for the data. We strongly recommend verifying the validity of the data with the material manufacturers before making a final decision.
Contact Us
Get App
Top